Share this Page


Final Rule Lowers Air Toxics from Stationary Diesel Engines

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is setting the first standards that will reduce emissions of formaldehyde, benzene, acrolein and other toxic air pollutants from certain stationary diesel engines. These pollutants are known or suspected to cause cancer or other serious health problems and environmental damage.

“Improving air quality is one the agency’s top priorities,” said Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation. “Controlling emissions from these engines will save lives and protect our communities from serious health problems, including heart attacks, asthma and other respiratory illnesses.”

The emission limits apply to existing diesel engines meeting certain criteria for age, size, and use. EPA estimates that more than 900,000 of the engines generate electricity and power equipment at industrial, agricultural and other facilities. The engines also are used in emergencies to produce electricity and pump water for flood and fire control. Emergency engines used at most residences, hospitals and other institutional facilities, and commercial facilities such as shopping centers are not covered by this rule.


To meet the emissions requirements, owners and operators of the largest of the engines will need to install emissions controls, such as catalysts, to engine exhaust systems. Emergency engines covered by this rule need to comply with operating requirements that will limit emissions.

EPA estimates that the rule will reduce annual air toxics emissions by 1,000 tons, particle pollution by 2,800 tons, carbon monoxide emissions by 14,000 tons, and organic compound emissions by 27,000 tons when fully implemented in 2013.

EPA will issue final emissions standards for similar existing stationary engines that burn gasoline, natural gas and landfill gas, known as spark ignition engines, by Aug. 10, 2010.


Comments

Fri, Feb 26, 2010

I agree with the above statements entirely! I don't think the government realizes the vast effects of their decisions to companies.

Thu, Feb 25, 2010 CA

Unfortunately these numbers are cooked. My experience is that the AB allows certain run hours for maintenance and operation. Our situation is 50/100 per month. We only operate the engine generators to confirm that they will properly perform in an emergency outage. They never see more than 1 hour a month in the summer time and as needed in an emergency outage to prevent flooding when it is raining cats and dogs. Can we see the smog impact when the air is being scrubbed in a rain storm? What the CARB does is look at the specific engine and assumes that that engine runs full tilt for the hours allowed (150) and then applies the reduction expected with the exhaust modifications. A couple of years ago they reduced the hours from 300 to the 150 and made a big todo about how the emissions were lowered by their great work, it was only on paper. It looks great but it is not reality. In a time of poor economy this is particularly difficult to pay for. I’ve seen 30 year old engine/generators that have to be replaced because they do not meet the latest requirements, having only 400 to 500 hours. Right now we are looking at replacing a perfectly functional unit for $150,000. When asked if we can pay for an exception the answer is no, the rules are rules and literally told that “logic does not work here”. Why not? Another example was to upgrade 3 engines also having very low usage, we spent $100,000 to do the upgrade what a waste of taxpayers money!

Thu, Feb 25, 2010

Just one more way the government is trying to put companies out of business. And they do a great job at this!!!!!!!!!! You would like to say the government should only do what they do best - but I can't think of anything they do best except spending our money!!!!!!!!!!! They do a GREAT job on this.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above