Pollution and Waste Treatment Solutions for Environmental Professionals
By Angela Neville March 1, 2002
In the past, many companies probably felt like they had only experienced the back of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) hand when they were smacked with fines and jail time for environmental missteps. Recently, however, EPA has been trying to move beyond traditional command and control enforcement techniques. Instead, the agency is increasingly using incentives to encourage compliance among the regulated community.
EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) has begun to work in partnership with EPA regional offices, state governments, tribal governments and other federal agencies to assist stakeholders in their compliance efforts. EPA's new helping hand approach demonstrates the agency recognizes that many businesses, local governments and federal facilities want to comply with environmental mandates, but need assistance in figuring out how to follow laws that are expanding at exponential rates in volume and complexity. As part of this new policy, the agency has started using the integrated approach of compliance assistance, compliance incentives, self-audits and new types of civil and criminal enforcement measures.
Now members of the regulated community can contact EPA's national compliance centers for fast, free help in dealing with tricky compliance issues. For today's harried environmental managers weighted down with large workloads and tight deadlines, these centers can provide online and fax back assistance services. In addition, they offer technical assistance with federal and state environmental regulations and pollution prevention strategies to the following sectors heavily populated with small businesses: agriculture, automotive service and repair, chemical manufacturing, federal government, local government, metal finishing, organic coating, printed wire board manufacturing, printing and transportation.
EPA also sponsors approximately 89 hotlines and clearinghouses that provide free ways of obtaining assistance with environmental requirements, especially for small businesses. The Small Business Ombudsman Hotline provides interested parties with a list of all the hot lines and help in selecting the most effective hotlines depending upon information needs. Key hotlines include:
Small Business Ombudsman - 800.368.5888;
Resource Conservation Recovery Act/Underground Storage Tank/Superfund Hotline - 800.424.9346;
Toxic Substances and Asbestos Information - 202.554.1404;
Safe Drinking Water - 800.426.4791;
Stratospheric Ozone/Chlorofluorocarbon Information - 800.296.1996;
Clean Air Technical Center - 919.541.0800; and
Wetlands Hotline - 800.832.7828.
Additionally, OECA has developed a wide variety of other compliance assistance tools including plain language compliance guides, training modules, compliance checklists, videos and resource guides. EPA estimates that in Fiscal Year 2001, it provided compliance assistance to more than one million individuals and businesses by direct assistance or through its compliance assistance centers.
Not surprisingly, many EPA officials think compliance assistance works best and is most utilized when there is a credible enforcement threat associated with the program. So despite EPA showing its kinder, gentler side through its outreach efforts to stakeholders concerning compliance issues, the agency still uses plenty of muscle in prosecuting polluters. In fact, during this past year while the agency was pushing its new compliance assistance programs, its enforcement division was going after violators more aggressively than ever.
On January 31, 2002, EPA released data on its enforcement and compliance assurance accomplishments for FY2001, which included several new records. The highlights are as follows:
EPA is now juggling the distinctly different roles of actively prosecuting violators of environmental laws while at the same time working closely with the regulated community to find workable and flexible compliance solutions. The agency should be commended for trying new methods to induce better environmental performance by industry, local communities and the general public.
About the author
Angela Neville
Angela Neville, JD, REM, is the former editorial director of Environmental Protection.
On April 2, 2008, exactly one year after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, 12 states, supported by an additional five states as amicus curiae, as well as the District of Columbia, the cities of New York and Baltimore, and a number of environmental organizations, filed a petition for mandamus with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit seeking to compel the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to act on remand within 60 days.