Pollution and Waste Treatment Solutions for Environmental Professionals
February 12, 2008
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) could significantly reduce global warming pollution from coal-fired plants and other industrial processes, but only if properly regulated, according to testimony Jan. 31 by a Texas-based energy policy specialist before the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
"We aren’t champions of coal, but we are realists," said Scott Anderson, the specialist who works for Environmental Defense. "…We believe that energy efficiency and renewable energy measures are smarter options. However, since the transition away from fossil fuels is likely to take a very long time, we foresee a long-term need to deal with coal-based emissions, and therefore, the sooner we begin to develop CCS technology, the better."
Anderson testified on "The Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Study Act of 2007" (S. 2144), which would require a feasibility study of constructing and operating carbon dioxide pipelines and sequestration facilities, and "The Carbon Capture and Storage Technology Act of 2007" (S. 2323), which would establish an interagency task force to develop CCS regulations.
CCS is the process of capturing carbon dioxide from industrial processes and then injecting it into deep geological formations, including deep saline reservoirs and existing oil and gas fields, where it can safely remain for thousands of years. The result would be a significant reduction of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere.
"Public acceptance of CCS will happen only if the public is confident that rigorous and credible regulatory oversight is in place," Anderson said.
On April 2, 2008, exactly one year after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, 12 states, supported by an additional five states as amicus curiae, as well as the District of Columbia, the cities of New York and Baltimore, and a number of environmental organizations, filed a petition for mandamus with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit seeking to compel the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to act on remand within 60 days.